Select Manufacturer ... Select car tax a manufacturer ... Audi Opel MG Abarth Alfa Romeo Infinity Isuzu Jeep Buick BMW Great Wall Dodge Honda Toyota Volvo Hyundai Jaguar Lancia Land Rover Lexus Maserati Mazda Mercedes Mini Mitsubishi Nissan Ssangyong Subaru Suzuki Seat Skoda Smart Citroen Volkswagen Ford Peugeot Porsche Ferrari Fiat Kia Cadillac Chevrolet Chrysler Renault
Home | News | SUV test vehicle video entertainment magazine Gallery Car Comparisons new car buying guide free consultation hot topics: Peugeot 308 Hyundai i10 Mazda 3 Mazda CX-5 Nissan Kia Picanto Jock Skoda Octavia Toyota Corolla Hyundai i35
Auto car news blog new gas showrooms hot vehicle safety technology site Green Car Leasing magazine tests and opinions magazines car tax speed traps Buying Guide Home Motor Sports Classics and History trucks / commercial car tax space worth watching auto industry
NCAP organization's announcement about changing the requirements for the 5-star safety score raised an interesting issue. As a reminder, the minimum scores were for 5 stars 75% to 80% in protecting adults, from 70% to 75% in child protection, and from 20% to 40% in protecting pedestrians (Section latter is significant most). But in 2009 we examined dozens of cars in NCAP under the previous standard, introduced at the beginning of last year, and the vast majority scored 5 stars respectable. What if there were ranked by the latest standard car tax modified prior to 2010? So we went and checked. Well it turns out that quite a few manufacturers proudly proclaimed 5-star grades to their cars will have to swallow a frog. In 2009, achieved no less from 42 cars including safety score of 5 stars. No less than 18 of them were forced to settle for 4 stars by the latest standard of NCAP. Here is the full list - and as you can see is a total failure are common car tax cars in Israel, Gonen Honda Civic, Mazda 6, Mitsubishi Lancer, Subaru B4 and Chevrolet Cruze. It is important to note that no change actual safety of these cars, of course - it is still a very safe cars their passengers. The reason lost the fifth star for most of them is a low score protect pedestrians. It is also important to note that many cars were tested before 2009, according to a different car tax standard, and won so many 5-star score probably would not receive him under the new standard. But we have no practical way to test this. Here is the complete list of those cars tested in 2009 and which would not receive 5 stars by the current standard (section appears in parentheses because of him would fail). Audi A4 (pedestrians) Audi Q5 (pedestrians Honda Civic (adults) Honda Jazz (adults) Volvo C30 (pedestrians) Toyota iQ (kids) Mazda 6 (adults) Mercedes C-Class (pedestrians) Sierra (pedestrians) Subaru B4 (adults, children) Citroen C5 (pedestrians) Citroen DS3 (pedestrians) Kia Soul (pedestrians) Volkswagen Sirocco car tax (kids) Peugeot 3008 (pedestrians) Peugeot 308 CC (pedestrians) Peugeot 5008 (pedestrians) Chevrolet Cruze (pedestrians)
Gasoline is much more flammable and volatile diesel. Not for nothing in the past 60-70 diesel-driven use of tanks, because if the tank is not over flare. Believe me, as a Sirionr res I know very well the difference between diesel and petrol. Do not believe me? There is no need. Search on Google
1. Diesel more flammable gasoline did you experiment, try to light and try to light diesel gasoline Look easier to light with a match. Well actually, do not do it ... Secondly, it was old cars, Mercedes from the 80-90 and 90 th generation Hyundai has improved standards and was dealing with problems car tax of arson, but basically only about 3% of the accidents which have not always as a Htllachhot Direct of an accident.
Protect the passengers and the driver she received the highest score! And bar cruise car tax is better than Mazda 3, Toyota Corolla and Lancer is not even a competition car tax for her (I checked them and I chose to cruise), Then, when I have the money for the Touareg, Infiniti car tax or Porsche I will consider buying them in the meantime I'm car tax satisfied with it.
Two accidents in recent horrific car caught fire. Killing the passengers who were still alive and might have a chance to be saved and rehabilitated. By the way, I may be wrong, but I think that in this context a diesel powered car safer because diesel is not flammable as gasoline. Diesel turns on only in direct contact with fire Unlike gasoline, electric spark is enough to make him a conflagration.
Toyota Mazda Mitsubishi. Better Cruise? What is the annual joke for 2010. We saw exactly what the Japanese equivalent of the year. Mazda's bluff soon also published. Just like airbags unopened and chairs flying from the windshield. So dear friend will continue to travel on Hfhnoaim Chinese \ Turkish guise of Japanese and have fun all the way to the next Ricol. Just remember to move in neutral and the brakes to commit suicide
You say you mean actually Infinity Nissan disguise so they can charge you another 200 thousand shekels? Will continue to be a sucker and buy Japanese costume. 'Eleq I went to buy a premium brand Lexus salesman trying to yap me this Lexus models had not Toyota. And about that Toyota Mitsubishi and Mazda does not count the Chevy see your concept. I prefer car tax all Chevrolet currently based on the Japanese wear you mentioned. I saw how good the Toyota wear a vegetable. 8.5 million Ricolim apparently it a really good one. After all Toyota vehicles that invented one has thought of them. They accelerators alone inhibit alone and sometimes deviate from the road alone . Surely Israeli pride Hhhhhhhhhh.
You write on the protection of passengers and the driver, but it's only 2 \ 3 tests, there is a third test and a test pedestrian protection - where cruise fell, and the new standards would have gotten 4 stars - and wrote you this story. The first to jump.
Protect the driver and passengers in front and behind! She passed all family cars in its category as Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Mazda 3, Mitsubishi Lance
No comments:
Post a Comment